With the way things are looking for Adrian Peterson it appears like there is a chance their careers could end the same way too.
via Twitter |
Peterson's story is different, but the end result could be the same. He has made it no secret that he would like to play in his home state of Texas, but the Vikings have said that they will not release him and have no intentions of trading him (Peterson does not become an unrestricted free agent till 2018).
After the way he says some of the front office treated him during his suspension last season Peterson has said that he does not trust the Vikings front office and has lost faith in them. Tack on the argument his agent and someone from the Vikings front office had at the Combine for all to see and the future for AP in Minnesota does not look good.
So--what can the man do? Basically, as long as he is under contract he has to play for Minnesota or retire. Sanders wanted to return after retiring, but since the Lions still had rights to him he did not. With the Vikings not willing to let him go he does not have many options.
It all may depend on what Jerry Jones is willing to give up for a running back that will turn 30 before next season.
It all may depend on what Jerry Jones is willing to give up for a running back that will turn 30 before next season.
On one hand, you would think bargaining power would be in his favor. Minnesota is set to lose a player of Peterson's caliber for nothing if he decides not to play rather than play for Minnesota. Getting something rather than nothing is always preferred. At the same time, what should they ask for arguably the best running back since Barry Sanders? Should they temper their expectations since Peterson is getting older?
Since Jones knows Peterson does not want to be in Minnesota does it give him any bargaining power?
Since Jones knows Peterson does not want to be in Minnesota does it give him any bargaining power?
No comments:
Post a Comment